I know it’s still days away, but this is the last letter/blog I’ll write before Christmas. It’s been quite the year — people are still trying to recover from 2020, although it’s been almost three years. Lead times are down, but we’re still dealing with labor shortages and other market crunches.
Some of us have decided that we will continue to work from home, which is not an option for the shop and field crews. But office vacancy rates still seem to be to a point where there’s not a lot of demand for new office buildings, a major segment that impacts our industry. Anything you can do there would help.
Here’s a thought: you could spread out your production facilities into these empty spaces, at least for the lighter work you do, and not rely so heavily on a single factory at the North Pole. Would any of your elves consider relocating to train new hires in these other areas?
There’s been a lot of concern about dwindling resources, becoming carbon-neutral, and whether or not we will reverse the effect of global warming. This weighs heavily on the construction trades, not just the glazing industry, because producing steel, concrete, glass, aluminum and other materials require a lot of energy.
There are folks out there clamoring that we ought to be doing more. But if I had one Christmas wish, it would be to get building owners on board. Right now, owners don’t seem to be getting the message, which means that architects don’t always design greener buildings. Presently, nothing is driving earth-friendly design and operation. Architects take their marching orders from the owners, as do we all in the final analysis, and the result is that buildings are built to today’s lesser standards vs. what’s required for the future.
Maybe legislators need to make reaching certain performance and energy use levels a legal requirement, thereby putting the owners and developers on the same page regarding more energy-efficient buildings. Then maybe the tide will shift. Don’t know if you have any pull here, but we’ll take any help you can lend at this point.
I know recycling glass is a big issue, too. When float glass is produced, it’s often specific to that float plant and manufacturer. Getting recycled glass back into the float glass process isn’t like recycling steel or aluminum. Float plant A produces a specific tint or low-iron or any glass particular to their glass operation. They can’t accept just any old, recycled glass to put in the next batch they run; they have to have only their glass, or otherwise, they risk “contaminating” their new float run. I even heard this morning that turning commercial glass into bottles, what appears to be a “natural” flow for recycling glass at present, isn’t as clear-cut as it appeared. There’s something about commercial glass that doesn’t work as well to form bottles as easily as it might appear.
But recycling glass back to its original float line is just one aspect of commercial glazing to “undo” before the glass is fit for the float furnace. When that glass gets processed after it’s floated and formed, when films are added, when it’s laminated, when it’s made up into IGUs, before it can be recycled, that all has to be undone, stripped, if you will, from the glass.
It’s going to take a two-pronged approach to resolve.
- How do we recycle glass to address the concerns of float glass manufacturers?
- How do we undo the fabrication?
Wouldn’t it be great if the fabricators, float manufacturers, industry trade groups and non-architectural glass users got together and started to work this out, addressing these recycling issues and leading the way for all industries? They will all see hard times if resources dry up faster than they can adapt to making glass with a greater percentage of recycled content.
But make no mistake, the rest of us will pay, too, downline from what I’ll call the “prime” manufacturers as the ultimate end-users of their products.
The other side of either of these equations will always be the cost. Let’s go back to the cars of our youth. I can remember buying cars without things like seatbelts, remote control rearview mirrors, heated seats and steering wheels, cameras in the rear, motion sensing or lane-changing warning systems. There are now cars that will drive and park themselves, with little or no direct input from people. And they don’t make cars the same way; there are more robots now than before.
My point, Santa, is that while the cost of making these changes is going to be huge, we have to realize that it will cost something more than we used to pay or are paying now, and we’ll have to bear it, willingly or begrudgingly. I can argue that the cost will be worth it compared to not doing anything. Otherwise, aren’t we just kicking the can down the road and leaving it for our kids and grandkids to figure out?
So, whatever you can do to ease that pain, and it will be painful, will be greatly appreciated.
Give my regards to the Mrs. Spending time with the family (after Christmas, I imagine, for you – not before, please) is part of the season’s joy. Help us remember the reason for the season, too, please.
Merry Christmas, and thanks for reading.